library: the harness keeps the subscribers, and an id belongs to whoever opened it
Three services had each written the same thing and got it three different ways: input polled the process list to notice a dead subscriber, and only when someone else subscribed; the power service never noticed at all; the device manager noticed drivers but not subscribers. The harness owns the table now, driven by the events a protocol declares — it registers on the reserved verb, frames each event once, posts to everyone interested without waiting on any of them, and reclaims a slot when the kernel says its owner died. Interest masks moved to the envelope, so a subscriber that wants only mice asks the same way everywhere. Two consequences the plan had not foreseen. The device manager now hears a supervised child's death twice, once as its supervisor and once as a subscriber, so restart backoff counted every crash twice and gave up after half as many; it retires the id before counting. And the kernel's published exit table had eight slots for what is now six subscriptions in a plain boot, so it holds sixteen. The other half is a hole the design named early and left standing: a backend handed out a small integer and then honoured it from anyone. A process that guessed a file's node id read another client's file; a display layer had no owner at all, so any client could reconfigure or destroy any layer; a USB device token was never checked against the client that opened it. Each is now bound to the task that opened it, and a wrong owner gets exactly what an unknown id gets — the refusal must not become the oracle the identical answers elsewhere were designed to remove. Closing a file changed with it: it used to succeed unconditionally, which would have told a caller which ids existed. Suite 111/111, with a new case in which one process holds a file and a layer, hands both ids to a second process, and finds them untouched after that process has tried everything with them.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -212,10 +212,24 @@ Open-node ids live in the backend. A client that dies without closing leaks
|
||||
nothing permanently: the backend (the FAT server) subscribes to the kernel's
|
||||
published process-exit events (docs/process-lifecycle.md) and releases a dead
|
||||
client's handles. The kernel VFS root needs no sweep at all — its node tokens
|
||||
are permanent for a boot and carry no open state. Ids are plain integers, not
|
||||
capabilities — a backend trusts its callers with each other's ids today, which
|
||||
is acceptable while every client is part of the system image and worth
|
||||
revisiting (per-client id namespaces) before third-party binaries arrive.
|
||||
are permanent for a boot and carry no open state.
|
||||
|
||||
Ids are plain integers rather than capabilities, so the backend **scopes them
|
||||
to the caller's badge**: an open node belongs to the task that opened it, and
|
||||
every verb that names one — read, write, status, readdir, close — is answered
|
||||
only for that task. A node id is a small number drawn from a table of
|
||||
thirty-two, trivially guessable, and until this rule a backend honoured every
|
||||
client's ids from every other client
|
||||
(docs/os-development/protocol-namespace.md: *handles must be scoped per
|
||||
client — validated against the badge, or drawn from a per-client id
|
||||
namespace*).
|
||||
|
||||
The refusal is deliberately **identical to absence**: a node that is somebody
|
||||
else's answers `-ENOENT`, exactly as one that was never opened, so a prober
|
||||
learns nothing about which ids are live — the same discipline the protocol
|
||||
namespace applies to a refused open. The owner is a *task*, because the badge
|
||||
is: a threaded client uses a node from the thread that opened it, which is
|
||||
already the granularity of the exit sweep that releases it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Evolution rules
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user