The enforcement section of the storage architecture: the three levers the
device lifecycle already proved, mapped onto volumes — a filesystem can only
be GIVEN its volume (no establishment grants, channel at spawn), the volume
manager supervises with teeth (deadline, kill-on-removal, crash-loop cap),
and the shared harness makes every engine inherit the state machine by
construction (engines never see channels). Kernel backstops: ownership-gated
fs_unmount + the lazy dead-endpoint sweep. Checkable via a lifecycle
conformance drill parameterized over filesystems — supporting a filesystem
MEANS passing it.
The settled shape from the storage-stack discussion, written as the
reference: the data path (vfs -> filesystem service -> block -> driver) as
the application/service/protocol/driver model applied twice; the three kinds
of boundary (protocol between processes, library inside them, control-plane
beside them); the volume manager as the policy home (planned — the FAT
service squats on its duties today, marked as such); adding a filesystem as
engine + shared harness + one configuration row; and the per-layer
responsibility table for removable media — one removal path, kill/retire/
respawn, dirty data lost and SAID to be lost. Indexed from docs/README.md.
Daniel Samson