# The display service: a framebuffer compositor The [framebuffer](framebuffer.md) the loader hands over is a flat block of pixel memory, and the kernel's [bootstrap console](../system/kernel/console.zig) draws text into it directly. That console is a stop-gap. The **display service** (`system/services/display/`) is the real thing: an ordinary ring-3 process that *owns* the framebuffer, composes a stack of **layers** into an off-screen back buffer, and **presents** finished frames to the screen — the display half of the GUI track ([vision.md](vision.md)), the sibling of the [input service](input.md). This note is the architecture and the reasoning behind it. The concrete build order lives in [display-plan.md](display-plan.md). ## First, a distinction that shapes everything: GOP vs. the PCI device It is tempting to think "the GOP framebuffer" and "the VGA-compatible display controller in the PCIe tree" are two different things. They are not — they are **two interfaces to the same silicon, at different times and different levels**, and knowing which one you're holding decides what you can do. - **GOP is firmware's *temporary* driver** for the display controller. It gives you a linear framebuffer pointer and can set video modes — but only until `ExitBootServices`. The loader already leans on this: [`queryFramebuffer`](../boot/efi.zig) reads the monitor's EDID, picks the native mode, and calls `set_mode` **before** exiting ([gop.md](gop.md)). Once the kernel runs, GOP is **gone** — no `set_mode`, no mode list, no EDID. What survives is the frozen snapshot in [`BootInformation.framebuffer`](../system/boot-handoff.zig): `{base, width, height, pitch, format}`, and nothing more. - **The PCI class-0x03 device is the raw controller** — BARs, config space, registers, IO ports. It is what you actually *own* after boot. On QEMU's emulated adapter ([`-device VGA,edid=on`](../build.zig), the Bochs VBE/DISPI model) the `base` GOP handed you *is* that device's linear-framebuffer BAR — the same physical memory, seen through a different door. On a real discrete GPU, GOP's `base` is an aperture inside the GPU's VRAM BAR. danos already decodes this device ([pci-class.zig](../system/devices/pci-class.zig) has the full `display` namespace, and `pci-bus` already reports it to the [device manager](device-manager.md) with its class triple) — but nothing binds it yet. What that difference costs you, concretely: | You want to… | Dumb GOP framebuffer (boot handoff) | Native device driver (PCI 0x03) | |-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------| | **Report** the current mode | ✅ from the handoff | ✅ | | **Change resolution / bpp at runtime** | ❌ GOP is gone | ✅ program DISPI regs / virtio-gpu queue | | **Re-read EDID, enumerate monitor modes** | ❌ | ✅ the device exposes an EDID block | | **Refresh rate** | ❌ (virtual anyway) | only a real KMS driver — far future | | **vblank / tear-free present** | ❌ no vblank signal | ✅ vblank IRQ + page-flip (real GPUs) | | **Works on the Pi (no PCI VGA)** | ✅ VideoCore hands a simple FB | ✗ per-device | The lesson: the **portable base for the whole GUI stack is the GOP / boot-handoff linear framebuffer**. Runtime mode-setting is a *per-device upgrade* layered on top — and on the Raspberry Pis there is no PCI VGA at all, so the neutral framebuffer is the only thing all three target machines share. That is why the display service is built on the dumb framebuffer first, with the native backend as an optional module behind the same interface. ## Two constraints this service exists to meet Like the input service — which existed partly to motivate the asynchronous [`ipc_send`](ipc.md) primitive — the display service runs straight into two limits the rest of the system hasn't had to face: 1. **The framebuffer is kernel-only today.** It arrives through the boot handoff, is mapped into the kernel's physmap, and is touched only by [`console.zig`](../system/kernel/console.zig). It is *not* a [devices-broker](../system/kernel/devices-broker.zig) node, so `device.claim`/`mmio_map` cannot reach it, and there is no framebuffer [syscall](syscall.md). A user-space display service needs a **new mechanism just to touch the pixels**. (See "The handoff" below — this is built.) 2. **danos has no cross-process shared memory.** The memory syscalls are `mmap` (private, zeroed), `mmio_map` (a *claimed device's* MMIO), and `dma_alloc` (new pinned physical). The block driver's "pass a buffer by physical address" trick ([block/protocol.zig](../system/services/block/protocol.zig)) works *only because its consumer is DMA hardware*. A compositor that CPU-reads and blends client layers can't use it — it would have to *map* another process's memory, which nothing allows. This is deferred (see "What v1 does not do"), because v1 sidesteps it entirely. ## Architecture ``` kernel ── owns the boot framebuffer; bootstrap console only │ seeds a "display0" device node from BootInformation.framebuffer │ (ResourceKind.memory = [base, height*pitch], write-combining hint, │ plus DisplayInfo{width, height, pitch, format}) ▼ display service (system/services/display/, ServiceId.display) ← the compositor │ device.claim(display0) → mmio_map(WRITE-COMBINING) = FRONT buffer (the LFB) │ mmap(cacheable) a BACK buffer of the same geometry │ owns: an ordered LAYER STACK + a per-frame DAMAGE list │ loop: composite dirty layers → back buffer → present dirty rects → front │ backend is an INTERNAL interface: {gop-fb} today; {bochs-dispi, virtio-gpu} later ▼ reached by name (ipc_lookup); clients drive it over the display protocol ┌────────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┐ drawing clients (v1) surface clients (deferred) runtime.display commands: runtime.display surfaces: create_layer / configure_layer shm_create → pass as a capability → fill_rect / blit_tile / damage the compositor maps & composites the present client-rendered bitmap directly ``` The bring-up sequence mirrors a hardware driver's — it is the [`usb-xhci-bus` `initialise`](../system/drivers/usb-xhci-bus/usb-xhci-bus.zig) shape (claim → `mmio_map` → run loop) — and the request/reply service shell is the [FAT](../system/services/fat/fat.zig) / [input](../system/services/input/input.zig) shape ([`runtime.service.run`](../library/runtime/service.zig) with a `protocol.zig` of `extern struct` messages and an `Operation` tag). **One process, for now.** v1 is a *single* service that both owns the framebuffer and composites — it does not split a "framebuffer driver" from a "compositor" the way input splits `ps2-bus` from the input service. The backend (dumb FB vs. a native GPU) is an *internal* interface, not a process boundary. That boundary earns its keep only when a second backend or a second monitor appears; until then it is complexity with no payoff. ## The handoff: a device node + a write-combining map The framebuffer crosses into user space through the machinery that already exists for every other device, rather than a bespoke syscall — so it inherits ownership, release-on-death, and re-claim-on-restart for free (the [resilience](resilience.md) story: a crashed display service returns the LFB to the kernel, and its restart re-claims it). - The kernel seeds a synthetic **`display0`** node into the [devices-broker](../system/kernel/devices-broker.zig) at init, from `BootInformation.framebuffer`: one `ResourceKind.memory` resource spanning `[base, height*pitch]`, tagged **write-combining**, plus a small `DisplayInfo{width, height, pitch, format}` (the memory resource says *where* and *how big*; `DisplayInfo` says how to *interpret* the bytes). - The service `device.claim`s it and `mmio_map`s the resource. The map is **write-combining**, not the strong-uncacheable that `mmio_map` uses for register MMIO. The kernel already programs a WC PAT slot for its own console ([`setupPat`](../system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/paging.zig)); this reaches it from the user mapping path. **This matters:** an uncacheable framebuffer makes the back→front blit unusably slow. - On `claim`, the kernel's bootstrap console goes quiet, so the two never fight over the LFB. A panic is the one exception — by then the service is likely dead anyway, and a panic on screen wins. The display service is a **named boot service**: `init` spawns it by name alongside `vfs`/`input`/`device-manager` ([init.zig](../system/services/init/init.zig)), and it self-discovers `display0` with `device.enumerate`. The [device manager](device-manager.md) matching path (PCI class 0x03 → a driver) is reserved for the future *native* backend, not this singleton synthetic node. ## Double buffering and the write-combining discipline Two buffers, with deliberately different memory types: - The **front buffer** is the LFB — **write-combining**: fast to *write*, slow to *read*. The rule is therefore **never read the front buffer**. Only ever stream into it, sequentially. - The **back buffer** is ordinary **cacheable** RAM (`mmap`), the same geometry. All compositing happens here, where reads and read-modify-write blends are cheap. So a frame is: compose every dirty layer into the cacheable back buffer, then **present** — copy the changed regions back→front in sequential, WC-friendly writes. Two details the [framebuffer](framebuffer.md) note already establishes carry over: step rows by `pitch`, not `width*4`; and handle both `rgbx` and `bgrx` [pixel formats](gop.md). ## Flicker vs. tearing — what double buffering does and doesn't buy These are two different artifacts, and the dumb framebuffer fixes exactly one of them: - **Flicker** is the user seeing intermediate, half-drawn states (a clear-then-redraw flash). Double buffering **eliminates it completely** — the screen only ever receives whole, finished frames. - **Tearing** is a present landing while the display's scanout beam is mid-frame, so the top of the screen shows the new frame and the bottom the old. Avoiding it requires presenting during the vertical blank (**vsync**) — which needs a vblank signal. **A dumb GOP framebuffer has no vblank.** So v1 is **flicker-free**, and it *minimizes* the tear window by presenting only damaged rectangles (less to copy → a smaller window in which the beam can catch a half-updated frame), but it is **not tear-free**. Genuine vsync waits for a backend with a vblank IRQ or a flush/flip path — a native-device capability, not something the firmware framebuffer can offer. Stated plainly here so the limitation is understood, not discovered. ## Layers and the client protocol The compositor holds an **ordered stack of layers**. Each layer has a rectangle, a z-order, a visibility flag, and a surface. Presenting walks the stack bottom-to-top, painting each dirty layer into the back buffer, then flushes the damage to the front. In v1 the surfaces are **server-owned**, and clients draw into them with a small immediate-mode command protocol — essentially the model early X used, and enough for a shell, a terminal, a cursor, and a wallpaper: | Operation | Meaning | |--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| | `info` | report `{width, height, pitch, format}` of the display | | `create_layer` | allocate a server-owned surface, return a layer handle | | `configure_layer` | set a layer's rect, z-order, visibility | | `destroy_layer` | release a layer | | `fill_rect` | fill a rectangle of a layer with a colour | | `blit_tile` | copy a small client-supplied pixel tile into a layer (inline) | | `damage` | mark a region of a layer dirty | | `present` | composite dirty layers and flush to the screen | Text is intentionally *not* an operation — a client renders glyphs by blitting tiles (the [PSF font](../system/kernel/font.psf) path the console already uses can move into a client). Keeping the protocol to rectangles and tiles keeps the compositor small and the policy in the client. ## `runtime.display` Clients speak the protocol through a new [`library/runtime/display.zig`](../library/runtime/runtime.zig), the [`runtime.block`](../library/runtime/block.zig) shape (a cached `.display` lookup with a boot-race retry): `display.info()`, a `Layer` handle with `fill` / `blitTile` / `damage`, and `present()`. Application code never issues the raw syscalls — it calls the runtime, as with every other danos service. ## What v1 does not do (and why that's fine) Two capabilities are deliberately out of the first cut. Neither reshapes anything above; both are clean additions behind the interfaces v1 establishes. - **Client-rendered surfaces (shared memory).** The fast path for a bitmap-heavy app is to render into its *own* buffer and hand the compositor a *reference*, not a stream of commands. That needs the missing cross-process shared-memory primitive — best built as the natural generalization of the existing M13 [capability passing](driver-model.md) from *endpoints* to *memory objects* (`shm_create(len) → {cap, vaddr}`, pass `cap` on an `ipc_call`, receiver `shm_map(cap) → vaddr`). v1 avoids it because server-owned surfaces already prove the whole pipeline. - **Runtime mode-setting (a native backend).** Detecting the EDID mode list and changing resolution / bpp at runtime needs the raw PCI device. The first native backend is Bochs DISPI — the register interface QEMU's `-device VGA` exposes — behind the same internal backend interface the dumb framebuffer sits behind. Refresh-rate and colour management (a gamma LUT) are real-GPU-KMS territory, far beyond this. ## Verifying it Three QEMU test cases ([tests.zig](../system/kernel/tests.zig), `python3 test/qemu_test.py `), each layering on the last: - **`display`** — the kernel handoff: the seeded `display` device is shaped correctly and the claim → `mmio_map` leaf is genuinely **write-combining** (PAT entry 4), asserted at the page-table level. - **`display-service`** — the compositor comes up: it claims the framebuffer, allocates the cacheable back buffer, presents a cleared frame through the double-buffer path (`display: online … / presented frame 0`), and a startup **self-check** composites two overlapping layers on the real framebuffer and reads them back — overlap = the top layer — logging `display: compositor self-check ok`. - **`display-demo`** — the full pipeline from a separate process: the hardware-free [`display-demo`](../system/services/display-demo/) client (the [`input-source`](../system/services/input-source/) analog) drives layers — a wallpaper, a sliding rectangle, a cursor — through the layer client API and heartbeats `display-demo: ok`, proving a frame travelled client → compositor → screen, exactly as the [input test](input.md) proves an event travels source → service → subscriber. The visible motion itself is a screenshot away via `zig build run-x86-64`. The compositor's pixel math (rectangle clipping, fill, composite, tile blit) and colour packing are additionally covered by pure host unit tests under `zig build test`. ## See also - [framebuffer.md](framebuffer.md) — the linear framebuffer, pitch vs. width, `volatile`. - [gop.md](gop.md) — GOP, and why only linear RGBX/BGRX modes are paintable. - [input.md](input.md) — the sibling service; the async `ipc_send` fan-out. - [driver-model.md](driver-model.md) — claim / `mmio_map`, capability passing, the trust model. - [device-manager.md](device-manager.md) — matching and supervision (the native backend's route). - [display-plan.md](display-plan.md) — the ordered build-out.