//! protocol-denied-test — restriction stage one's own test fixture //! (docs/os-development/protocol-namespace.md, "Restriction: per-process //! namespaces, not ACLs"). One binary, one role, driven by the //! `protocol-denied` kernel case: //! //! - `protocol-denied-test run` — the driver, and the assertions: //! 1. a contract this binary IS granted opens: the reply says success and //! carries a capability — the channel itself. The control comes first //! and is repeated last, because every refusal below would read exactly //! the same against a registrar that had simply stopped opening things; //! 2. a contract this binary is NOT granted is refused — and `/protocol`'s //! own listing is read first to prove the name is genuinely BOUND, so //! the refusal is a policy decision and not an accident of boot order; //! 3. the refusal is **indistinguishable from a name that does not exist**. //! The fixture asks for a name nothing ever bound and compares the two //! answers field by field — status, node, payload length, the whole //! reply packet byte for byte, and the presence of a capability. That //! collapse is the model, not a nicety: "permission denied" and "not //! found" are one answer, so an open can never be used as an oracle for //! what exists outside a process's view, and stage two's supervisor can //! refuse, park for a human, or substitute a fake with the child unable //! to tell which happened; //! 4. the third shape — neither granted nor bound — answers identically //! too, so all three collapse into one rather than two. //! //! **What this fixture deliberately does not claim.** Two channels are outside //! what a ring-3 client can honestly assert: //! //! - *The registrar's log.* `klog_read` is ungated, so a line written on one //! branch and not the other would be readable here — but the ring carries //! every task's output, so searching it for a contract name proves nothing //! either way (the input service prints "input:" lines of its own). The //! guarantee is made at the source instead: `onOpen` in //! system/services/init/init.zig writes nothing on any branch, and says why. //! - *Timing.* The difference worth measuring — a syscall or a serial write on //! one branch — is milliseconds, but this fixture shares four cores and a //! serial line with a booting system, so a measurement here would be noise //! wearing an assertion's clothes. `onOpen` asks both questions on every //! open, whatever the first one answers; that is the claim, and it is a claim //! about the code, checked by reading it. //! //! Prints `protocol-denied: ok` on success, or a `protocol-denied: FAIL` line //! naming the step. Spawned bare (the initial-ramdisk sweep starts every bundled //! binary), it exits silently so it cannot derange other tests. const std = @import("std"); const channel = @import("channel"); const envelope = @import("envelope"); const file_system = @import("file-system"); const ipc = @import("ipc"); const logging = @import("logging"); const process = @import("process"); const time = @import("time"); const vfs_protocol = @import("vfs-protocol"); /// The contract this fixture provides and then reaches — under `/protocol/test`, /// the subtree every `/test/` binary is granted. Binding it ourselves keeps the /// granted case to one process: the registry does not know or care that the /// provider on the other end of the channel is us. const granted_contract = "test/denied-probe"; /// A contract this fixture is NOT granted and that the case makes sure IS bound: /// the input service claims it, and only `input-source` and `input-test` are /// named against it in /system/configuration/protocol.csv. const forbidden_contract = "input"; /// A contract this fixture IS granted (the `test/*` subtree) and that nothing /// ever binds. The comparison partner: refusal must look like this. const absent_contract = "test/never-bound"; /// Neither granted nor bound. The third shape, so the collapse is into one /// answer rather than two. const forbidden_and_absent_contract = "display"; fn fail(step: []const u8) noreturn { _ = logging.write("protocol-denied: FAIL "); _ = logging.write(step); _ = logging.write("\n"); process.exit(1); } // --- talking to the registrar directly -------------------------------------- // // `channel.openEndpoint` folds every failure into null, which is exactly right // for a client and useless here: the whole assertion is about the *shape* of the // answer, so this fixture speaks the vfs protocol to the registry itself and // keeps every byte that came back. /// One `open` answer, kept whole. const Answer = struct { /// Bytes the registrar replied with — the reply packet's length is itself a /// channel, so it is compared like any other field. length: usize = 0, packet: [vfs_protocol.message_maximum]u8 = .{0} ** vfs_protocol.message_maximum, /// Whether a capability rode the reply. The one field that actually matters /// to a client: the capability IS the channel. capability: bool = false, /// The reply's envelope `Status`, decoded — compared field by field as well /// as byte for byte, so a failure says *which* field diverged. status: envelope.Status = .{ .status = 0, .len = 0 }, /// The node id the reply carried, or null when it carried no reply body at /// all. A refusal has none; the open of a contract carries a zero, because /// the capability is the whole answer. node: ?u64 = null, fn bytes(self: *const Answer) []const u8 { return self.packet[0..self.length]; } }; /// The registry's endpoint, obtained the way every process obtains it: resolve /// `/protocol`. The handle is the kernel's, shared with every other user of the /// mount, so it is never ours to close. fn registryEndpoint() ?ipc.Handle { // Patiently, for the same reason `bindPatiently` is patient: the kernel test // harness starts the registrar and this fixture together, so a first resolve // can land in the window before init has mounted `/protocol` at all. An // absent mount is a boot race and worth waiting out; a registrar that // answers has decided, and that answer is what the assertions below weigh. var attempt: u32 = 0; while (attempt < resolve_attempts) : (attempt += 1) { var relative: [channel.path_maximum]u8 = undefined; if (file_system.fsResolve(channel.root, 0, &relative)) |route| switch (route) { .kernel => return null, // a kernel route means something other than the registry owns the name .backend => |backend| return backend.handle, }; time.sleepMillis(resolve_retry_ms); } return null; } /// The cadence `channel.bindPatiently` uses, for the same window. const resolve_attempts: u32 = 200; const resolve_retry_ms: u64 = 20; /// One vfs-protocol request at the registry: the folded header, the verb's own /// fixed part, then the contract name as the packet's tail. Names go bare /// (`input`, not `/input`) — the registrar normalises both, and bare is what /// `bind` sends. fn transact( registry: ipc.Handle, comptime operation: vfs_protocol.Operation, request: vfs_protocol.Protocol.RequestOf(operation), name: []const u8, ) ?Answer { var packet: [vfs_protocol.message_maximum]u8 = undefined; const framed = vfs_protocol.Protocol.encodeRequest(operation, 0, request, name, &packet) orelse return null; var answer: Answer = .{}; const got = ipc.callCap(registry, framed, &answer.packet, null) catch return null; answer.length = got.len; answer.capability = got.cap != null; answer.status = envelope.statusOf(answer.bytes()) orelse return null; answer.node = if (operation == .open) blk: { const opened = vfs_protocol.Protocol.decodeReply(.open, answer.bytes()) orelse break :blk null; // A short reply decodes as garbage rather than absence, so the promised // length is what says whether a body is there at all. break :blk if (answer.status.len < @sizeOf(vfs_protocol.Opened)) null else opened.node; } else null; // A capability we did not ask to keep is a handle slot spent; the assertions // below only care that one arrived. if (got.cap) |handle| _ = ipc.close(handle); return answer; } /// `open(name)`, kept whole. Null only if the registry could not be reached at /// all — a registrar that answered has decided, and its decision is the subject. fn openContract(registry: ipc.Handle, name: []const u8) Answer { return transact(registry, .open, .{ .flags = 0 }, name) orelse fail("the registry stopped answering"); } /// Whether `/protocol` currently lists `name`. The namespace is browsable on /// purpose (docs/os-development/protocol-namespace.md: `readdir` lists protocol /// nodes like any others, so the tree stays diagnosable), and that is what lets /// this fixture prove a refused name is really there — without it, "refused" /// and "not bound yet" would be the same observation and the test would assert /// nothing. fn listed(registry: ipc.Handle, name: []const u8) bool { var cursor: u64 = 0; while (cursor < 64) : (cursor += 1) { const answer = transact(registry, .readdir, .{ .cursor = cursor }, "") orelse return false; if (answer.status.status != 0) return false; const entry = vfs_protocol.Protocol.decodeReply(.readdir, answer.bytes()) orelse return false; if (entry.name_len == 0) return false; // end of directory const text = vfs_protocol.Protocol.replyTail(.readdir, answer.bytes()); const length = @min(@as(usize, entry.name_len), text.len); if (std.mem.eql(u8, text[0..length], name)) return true; } return false; } /// Wait until `/protocol` lists `name` — the providers this case needs come up /// alongside the fixture, and racing them would make the assertions meaningless /// rather than merely flaky. fn awaitListed(registry: ipc.Handle, name: []const u8) void { var attempts: u32 = 0; while (attempts < 400) : (attempts += 1) { if (listed(registry, name)) return; time.sleepMillis(20); } _ = logging.write("protocol-denied: FAIL /protocol never listed "); _ = logging.write(name); _ = logging.write("\n"); process.exit(1); } /// Every caller-visible field of two answers, compared. `step` names the pair so /// a failure says which comparison broke and in which field. fn expectIdentical(step: []const u8, refused: Answer, absent: Answer) void { if (refused.status.status != absent.status.status) fail(step); // the errno if (!nodesMatch(refused.node, absent.node)) fail(step); // the node id an open would return if (refused.status.len != absent.status.len) fail(step); // payload bytes promised if (refused.length != absent.length) fail(step); // reply packet length if (refused.capability != absent.capability) fail(step); // the channel itself if (!std.mem.eql(u8, refused.bytes(), absent.bytes())) fail(step); // and every byte of it } /// Two node ids agree when both are absent or both are the same value. A refusal /// carries none at all now — the envelope sends a bare `Status` — so "no node" /// is itself one of the observations that has to match. fn nodesMatch(one: ?u64, other: ?u64) bool { if (one) |a| { return if (other) |b| a == b else false; } return other == null; } fn run() void { const registry = registryEndpoint() orelse fail("resolve /protocol"); // Provide the granted contract ourselves. `bindPatiently` waits out a // registry that has not mounted `/protocol` yet, which is the one thing // worth retrying — a registrar that answered has decided. const provider = ipc.createIpcEndpoint() orelse fail("create the provider endpoint"); if (!channel.bindPatiently(granted_contract, provider)) fail("binding a granted contract was refused"); // Both names must be bound before anything is asked of them, or the // comparison below would be between two boot races. awaitListed(registry, granted_contract); awaitListed(registry, forbidden_contract); // 1. The control. A granted, bound contract opens: success, and the // capability that IS the channel. const allowed = openContract(registry, granted_contract); if (allowed.status.status != 0) fail("a granted open was refused"); if (!allowed.capability) fail("a granted open carried no channel"); _ = logging.write("protocol-denied: granted open succeeded\n"); // 2. The refusal. `input` is bound — the listing above proved it — and no // manifest row names this binary against it. const refused = openContract(registry, forbidden_contract); if (refused.status.status != -envelope.ENOENT) fail("an ungranted open did not answer -ENOENT"); if (refused.capability) fail("an ungranted open carried a channel"); _ = logging.write("protocol-denied: ungranted open refused as absent\n"); // 3. The point of the whole fixture. A name this binary IS granted and that // nothing has ever bound, answered by the same registrar in the same // breath — and every caller-visible field of the two answers is the same. const absent = openContract(registry, absent_contract); expectIdentical("a refused open differed from a nonexistent name", refused, absent); // 4. And the third shape, so the two reasons collapse into one answer rather // than into two that happen to match: neither granted nor bound. const neither = openContract(registry, forbidden_and_absent_contract); expectIdentical("a refused-and-absent open differed from the others", refused, neither); _ = logging.write("protocol-denied: refusal is indistinguishable from absence\n"); // 5. The control again, after the refusals: the registrar is still opening // what it should, so what steps 2-4 saw was policy and not a registry // that had wedged. const again = openContract(registry, granted_contract); if (again.status.status != 0 or !again.capability) fail("the granted contract stopped opening"); _ = logging.write("protocol-denied: ok\n"); } pub fn main(startup: process.Init) void { const role = startup.arguments.get(1) orelse return; // bare (ramdisk sweep): stay silent if (std.mem.eql(u8, role, "run")) run(); }