The "fs.base" spelling read like a field/submodule access, but no such
identifier exists — it meant the x86_64 FS segment base (the IA32_FS_BASE
MSR). Two problems fixed:
- Arch-neutrality: in generic docs, the runtime, and the plan, the mechanism
is now named by its arch-neutral concept — the "thread pointer" — matching
the already-renamed `thread_pointer` Task field, `set_thread_pointer`
syscall, and `architecture.setThreadPointer` fn. x86-specific spots keep
the precise names: `IA32_FS_BASE` (the MSR), `%fs:8`/`%fs:0`, variant-II.
- Stale identifiers: the M10 section in threading-plan.md still referenced
`fs_base` on Task and `architecture.setFsBase` — both renamed away in the
arch-neutral pass. Corrected to `thread_pointer` / `setThreadPointer`.
The x86-only `thread-tls` test (which really does write `%fs:8`) now says
"FS base" (no dot) consistently, matching the established form already in
tests.zig. The matched serial markers ("thread-tls: ok" / "thread-tls:
FAIL") are unchanged; only a non-load-bearing FAIL parenthetical was
reworded.
Verified: zig build clean, thread-tls passes.
Daniel Samson
e2dddc941f