Files
Daniel Samson 6ddb08091d exfat: adversarial-review fixes — overflow safety, sparse gaps, dir size, big-image bitmap (S4 step 9)
A 7-dimension adversarial review of the engine, tool, and routing found
nine real defects (host tests + the in-VM drill missed them). Fixed:

- geometryOf now rejects a crafted VBR whose cluster shift exceeds the
  exFAT ceiling (bytes+sectors shift > 25) or whose cluster_count exceeds
  the spec max (0xFFFFFFF5) — either would overflow the engine's u32
  cluster-byte / cluster-bounds arithmetic and panic under ReleaseSafe on
  untrusted removable media. validCluster/allocateCluster widened to u64,
  and writeFile's clusters_needed widened, for a >4 GiB file near the u32
  offset boundary.
- writeFile no longer claims valid_data_length = size unconditionally: a
  sparse write past a foreign file's old valid boundary now zero-fills the
  skipped gap on disk, so a read there returns zero, not stale bytes.
- ensureDirCapacity rewrites a grown subdirectory's own DataLength, so a
  spec-compliant reader that bounds a directory by DataLength sees the new
  entries (danos itself bounds by the end marker, but chkdsk / other OSes
  do not).
- make-exfat-image lays the allocation bitmap across as many clusters as
  it needs; a >128 MiB image (whose bitmap exceeds one cluster) was
  self-inconsistent. Verified: the engine mounts+reads both the 48 MiB
  fixture and a 256 MiB image.

Documented (not fixed here — a shared vfs-layer limit, like the u32
offset cap): non-ASCII names fold to '?', the same as the FAT engine.

New host tests pin each fix (crafted-VBR rejection, sparse-gap zero,
subdir-grows-and-records-size). Full suite 131/131, bounds green.
2026-08-10 04:14:54 +01:00
..