The V4 adversarial review found removeVolume's comment overclaiming: it said
"the kernel sweeps a dead backend's mounts", which reads as an eager death-time
sweep. There is no such sweep. Killing the filesystem marks its backend endpoint
dead (killOwnedEndpointsLocked), and the VFS router retires each mount that
endpoint backed lazily, on the next path resolution under it (resolvePath sees
the dead backend, frees the slot, returns not_found). The functional guarantee
the comment promised — killing the filesystem retires its mounts — holds; only
the described mechanism was wrong. Comment-only; no behavior change.