Two real bugs visible in a normal `zig build run-x86-64` boot (but not in the
display-demo test, which spawns no input service):
- Two cursors. The demo drew its own cursor layer while the display service
now draws one too (its mouse-listener thread). The demo's went through the
client IPC protocol and lagged; the service's is in-process and tracks
tightly — "one responds better than the other."
- Animation frozen until the mouse moves. The demo called a *blocking*
`mouse.next()` (ipc_reply_wait) inside its animation loop, so the sliding
box advanced only one frame per mouse event. In the display-demo test
there is no input service, so subscribeMouse() returned null and the loop
ran free on its 30ms timer — which is exactly why the test passed while
the real boot was broken.
The compositor now owns the cursor (docs/display.md), so the demo should draw
none and read no input: it becomes a pure client-animation proof whose loop is
independent of the mouse. Removes its cursor layer, mouse subscription, and the
blocking read.
Also harden displayDemoTest to spawn the `input` service alongside the demo
(matching real boot): a client that blocks its animation loop on a mouse read
would now stall before `display-demo: ok` and fail the test, instead of
passing because no input service happened to be present.
Verified: display / display-service / display-demo / display-cursor all green.
Daniel Samson
5ab7263c9c