5.3 KiB
Device interrupts
CPU exceptions (interrupts.md) are the kernel reacting to its own mistakes. Device interrupts are the opposite: hardware asking for attention — a timer firing, a key pressed, a packet arriving. They share the IDT, but differ in one fundamental way: an exception here is terminal (we report and halt), while a device interrupt is handled and returned from, so the interrupted code resumes as if nothing happened. This is danos's first code that takes an interrupt and comes back — the same mechanism a scheduler will later use to preempt tasks.
The first device we bring up is the timer, because it's the simplest: it lives entirely on the CPU's local interrupt controller, needing no external routing. It's all x86_64-specific, behind the arch boundary.
The APIC, not the PIC
Interrupt delivery on modern x86 goes through the APIC, not the legacy 8259 PIC. There are two halves; we only need one so far:
- The Local APIC (per-CPU, memory-mapped at physical
0xFEE00000) handles the CPU's own timer and receives interrupts routed to it.src/arch/x86_64/apic.zig. - The IO-APIC routes external device lines (keyboard, etc.) to LAPIC vectors. Not needed for the timer — it'll arrive with the keyboard.
The old PIC has to be dealt with first, though: left alone it would deliver
interrupts on vectors 0x08-0x0F, which collide with the CPU exception
vectors — a spurious IRQ would look like a double fault. So init remaps the
PIC's vectors to 0x20-0x2F and masks every line, taking it out of the picture.
Then the LAPIC is enabled in two places: the IA32_APIC_BASE MSR's global-enable
bit, and the LAPIC's own spurious-vector register (bit 8 = software enable). The
spurious vector is 0x2F — low nibble F by convention, and inside our gate
range so a stray spurious interrupt lands on a valid no-op.
The timer
The LAPIC timer is three register writes (initTimer): a divide setting, then the
LVT-timer entry giving it a vector (32) and periodic mode, then an initial
count that becomes the reload value. From then on it fires vector 32 repeatedly, on
its own, forever.
The count isn't calibrated to real time yet — the tick rate is arbitrary (bus-clock dependent). Turning it into a known frequency (say 100 Hz) needs a reference clock to measure against (the PIT, HPET, or the TSC). That's a later step; for now it just needs to tick.
Two kinds of vector, one dispatch
The IDT now installs gates 0-47: the 32 exceptions plus the device range. Every
gate still funnels through the same stub tail (isr_common), which calls one
dispatcher that branches on the vector (interruptDispatch in idt.zig):
if (state.vector < 32) {
on_fault(state); // exception: report and halt (never returns)
} else if (handlers[state.vector]) |handler| {
handler(); // device: run the registered handler
apic.eoi(); // ...acknowledge the LAPIC
}
// else: spurious/unhandled — deliberately no EOI
Two things make device interrupts return where exceptions don't:
- The handler returns. The timer handler just bumps a tick counter. Control
flows back to
isr_common, which restores every register it saved and executesiretq— resuming the interrupted instruction exactly. (This is why the stub saves all the general registers.) - End-of-interrupt. After handling, we write the LAPIC's EOI register. Miss this and the LAPIC thinks we're still busy and never delivers the next interrupt. It's the single most common "my timer fired once and stopped" bug.
A device handler is a plain fn () void — a timer or keyboard handler doesn't need
the interrupted registers. (Note: the stubs don't save the SSE/vector registers, so
a handler must not use them; ours don't.)
Turning them on
Exceptions can't be masked, which is why they worked all along. Maskable device
interrupts don't fire until the CPU's interrupt flag is set — so the final step is
sti (arch.enableInterrupts()), after the APIC and timer are configured. From
that instant the kernel has a heartbeat, and its idle hlt loop
(halting.md) wakes on every tick and dozes off again.
Verifying it
The timer test (see testing.md) is the proof that an interrupt both
fires and returns: it records the tick count, busy-waits, and checks the count
advanced on its own.
$ python3 test/qemu_test.py timer
timer ... PASS (matched 'DANOS-TEST-RESULT: PASS')
If the APIC weren't enabled, or sti were missing, or EOI were forgotten, the
count would stay put and the test would fail. That it advances — while the CPU was
spinning in unrelated code — is the whole mechanism working end to end.
What's next (not done here)
- The keyboard: bring up the IO-APIC, route its IRQ to a vector, and read scancodes from the PS/2 controller — the first input device.
- A calibrated timer at a known frequency, and a monotonic clock.
- Uncacheable MMIO: the LAPIC page is currently mapped writeback-cacheable like the rest of the identity map. QEMU tolerates it, but real hardware wants MMIO marked uncacheable (via the page's cache bits or an MTRR).
- Preemption: once there are tasks, the timer handler is where the scheduler decides to switch — the reason a returning interrupt matters.