Daniel Samson 547d0ec46b docs: device authority — the how, and the run that deletes the ceilings
device-authority.md is rewritten as an implementation design rather than a
rival to device-manager.md. The what was already settled there in 2026-07:
structure in the manager, authority in the kernel, and delegation as the
step after hello. This is the how, plus the two decisions that paragraph
leaves open.

Decision 1: the manager claims, it is not granted. device-manager.md says
"claims (or is granted)"; claiming wins because the manager runs before any
driver exists and takes the seeded devices unopposed, leaving nothing unheld
to race for. One new call, device_transfer(device_id, task_id), checks only
that the caller holds the device — no names in the kernel, no attestation.
The alternative put a binary path inside the kernel, and the kernel should
hold only what cannot safely live in user space. The residual is stated
rather than hidden: authority rests on the manager claiming first, which
init.csv makes an operator-visible ordering rather than an attacker-
controlled one, and the enforced version arrives with the spawn capability
drivers.md already names as missing.

Decision 2: the kernel stops holding inventory. It reads three things out of
a descriptor — physical ranges, interrupt numbers, one PCI BDF — and stores
the rest only so device_enumerate can hand it back. Devices with no
resources leave the kernel entirely: a USB device conveys no mapping
authority, so there is nothing to enforce. That is also the case which
sidesteps containment, and therefore the reason a shared cap existed.

Decision 3: no shared ceiling. The table becomes dynamic — it is built after
heap.init, so nothing ever prevented it — and the two invented numbers go. A
per-holder quota replaces them, because dynamic storage with no bound moves
the ceiling to the kernel heap, which is shared and fatal rather than
partial. A bound charged to whoever caused it is isolation.

Two earlier drafts of this document are gone: one gave init the root grants,
the other proposed extracting a firmware-framebuffer driver. Both were wrong
and both are recorded as wrong in the run plan's settled list — the
framebuffer is not a device, it is where pixels go until a real display
driver announces itself.

Run 2 is nine steps, ordered so the suite stays green throughout: build and
prove the transfer mechanism, move the five claimants across one at a time,
then the flag day, then the inventory, then the ceilings.
2026-08-08 17:01:25 +01:00
2026-07-23 00:25:34 +01:00

DanOS

Codename: Shodan

A very small resilient operating system.

Zen of DanOS:

  • Resilient Micro-Kernel Architecture.
    • Every process run in an isolated user space not kernel space.
    • Processes cannot take down the entire OS with it when they die or is killed
  • Stable public runtime library, private OS ABI.
    • Keeps a stable runtime for user space processes between OS versions (great for backwards compatibility)
    • Allows the underlying OS to be changed without effecting applications
    • Provides a boundary to enable compatibility between OS's e.g. POSIX, MUSL etc
  • Drivers are just isolated processes in user space.
    • Thin binaries that can be restarted like applications.
    • Useful during driver development.
    • Drivers can claim MMIO / ports
    • Driver resources (e.g. IRQ/Port/MMIO) claims are automatically cleaned up if the driver dies or is killed
    • Drivers can also hook into the process lifecycle to clean up or reset hardware
  • No legacy to deal with
    • Zig code uses a clean coding style (Zen of Zig)
    • Favor reading code over writing code.
    • No magic numbers.
    • No shortened names unless its for ABI compatibility or acronyms
  • Inter-Process Communication (IPC)
    • Publish and subscribe to Asynchronous Messages
    • Talk to services and processes synchronously

Prerequisites

  • Zig 0.16.x — the build is pinned to this line (.zig-version); other minor versions are rejected, because Zig makes breaking changes between releases pre-1.0. A toolchain manager such as zvm or zigup will pick up .zig-version automatically.
  • QEMU (qemu-system-x86_64) — to run and test the kernel. On macOS, brew install qemu also bundles the OVMF firmware below.
  • OVMF UEFI firmware — the edk2-ovmf package (Arch), ovmf (Debian/Ubuntu), or edk2-ovmf (Fedora); on macOS it ships inside the Homebrew qemu formula. Both the build and the test harness probe the known Arch/Debian/Fedora/macOS layouts and use the first that exists, so no configuration is normally needed. Override with -Dovmf-code= / -Dovmf-vars= (build) if yours lives elsewhere.
  • Python 3 — for the QEMU integration test harness.

Build

zig build

Produces a FHS-shaped zig-out/ that is the danos filesystem and the boot volume: the UEFI bootloader at zig-out/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.efi, the kernel at zig-out/system/kernel, init at zig-out/system/services/init, drivers under zig-out/system/drivers/, the test fixtures under zig-out/test/system/services/, and the initial-ramdisk at zig-out/boot/.

Release media

zig build release-x86-64

Produces zig-out/danos-x86-64.iso, a hybrid ISO that boots flashed raw to a USB stick (balenaEtcher, dd) or burned to optical media — see docs/release-iso.md. zig build check-iso-image validates it without booting.

Run

Boot it in QEMU with OVMF (opens a display window):

zig build run-x86-64
# distro with OVMF elsewhere:
zig build run-x86-64 -Dovmf-code=/path/OVMF_CODE.fd -Dovmf-vars=/path/OVMF_VARS.fd

Test

zig build test            # host unit tests (the platform-independent shared code)
python3 test/qemu_test.py  # QEMU integration tests: boots the kernel and asserts
                           # on its serial output (see docs/testing.md)

The integration harness builds and boots the kernel once per test case, checking memory, the frame allocator, paging (incl. NX and the null guard), the heap, interrupts, and exception handling. It exits non-zero on any failure, so it drops straight into CI.

Documentation

Design notes explaining why behind the code live in docs/ — start with docs/README.md.

For the hardware needed to run DanOS — minimum specs plus a plain-language guide matching Intel/AMD CPU generations by name — see docs/system-requirements.md.

San Serif Text "Dan OS" with a black karate belt around it.

S
Description
Operating System written for me
Readme
43 MiB
Languages
Zig 93%
Python 6%
Assembly 1%