Files
danos/docs/arch.md
T
Daniel Samson 8754d4e46a Re-organize the source tree as a monorepo mirroring the FHS
The source layout now mirrors the runtime filesystem hierarchy
(docs/danos-file-system-hierarchy-FSH.md): what lives under system/ in the
source is what a running danos represents under /system. Each service and
driver is a sub-project directory that is its own Zig module — cross-project
references go by module name, never by a path into another project's files.

Moves (all git mv, history preserved):
- src/            -> system/            (danos internals; the self-representation)
    root.zig      -> danos.zig          (the kernel<->user contract module)
    kernel/arch/  -> kernel/architecture/   (arch -> architecture)
    device/       -> devices/           (what /system/devices reflects)
    boot/         -> /boot              (the loaders, top level)
- sbin/           -> split by role:
    init, vfs     -> system/services/<name>/<name>.zig
    hpetd, busd   -> system/drivers/<name>/<name>.zig
    vfs-test      -> system/services/vfs/vfs-test.zig  (inside the vfs project)
- lib/            -> library/runtime/   (room for other libraries beside runtime)

The VFS wire protocol becomes its own module, system/services/vfs/protocol.zig
("vfs-protocol"): the vfs sub-project exposes its interface, and the runtime's
file layer imports it by name. First instance of the "protocol module" pattern
(docs/driver-model.md); usb/block will expose theirs the same way.

Also: fix a naming-standard violation in the protocol — Op -> Operation (and
req -> request, _pad -> _padding). Docs updated: /system/services added to the
FHS doc, a repository-layout section added to the docs index, and stale source
paths swept across comments and docs.

Runtime boot paths are unchanged (the bootloader still loads /sbin/init);
aligning the runtime filesystem to the FHS is a separate follow-up. Suite 35/35
plus host tests green.
2026-07-10 12:55:56 +01:00

106 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown

# Architecture split
danos targets x86_64 today, but is meant to grow onto other systems later — a
Raspberry Pi, say, which is AArch64 and has no UEFI. To keep that possible without
a rewrite, CPU-specific kernel code lives behind a boundary: the generic kernel
never names an architecture, and each architecture plugs in behind it.
## The seam is a build-time module named `arch`
The mechanism is deliberately boring — no vtables, no function-pointer tables, no
runtime dispatch. `build.zig` exposes one architecture's code as a module called
`arch`:
```zig
const arch_mod = b.addModule("arch", .{
.root_source_file = b.path("system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/cpu.zig"),
});
```
and the generic kernel imports it by that name:
```zig
const arch = @import("arch");
// ...
arch.halt(); // never says "x86_64"
```
Adding a second architecture is then a build-time choice: create
`system/kernel/arch/aarch64/`, and point the `arch` module at it when the target CPU is
AArch64. `main.zig` and `console.zig` don't change. **That compiler-checked module
boundary _is_ the architecture interface** — when a new arch is missing a function
the generic kernel calls, the build fails and names exactly what's missing.
## What's arch-specific vs generic
The split follows a simple test: does it name a CPU instruction, a hardware
register, or a memory-management structure? If so, it's arch-specific.
| Arch-specific — `system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/` | Generic — kernel core |
|---|---|
| `cpu.zig`: `halt()` (`hlt`), later GDT/IDT/paging | `console.zig` — pure pixel math, works anywhere |
| `linker.ld` — link layout, load address | `main.zig` — `kmain` orchestration, panic handler |
| (future) interrupt controller, MMU setup | `root.zig` — the neutral handoff contract |
Notice the framebuffer console is *generic*: it just writes pixels into whatever
framebuffer it's handed, so it needs no per-arch version. Most of the kernel
should end up on the generic side; the arch module stays small.
## Two axes, kept separate
There are really two independent questions, and it's worth not conflating them:
- **CPU architecture** (x86_64 vs AArch64): instructions, MMU, interrupts →
`system/kernel/arch/<cpu>/`.
- **Boot protocol** (UEFI vs Raspberry Pi firmware + device tree): handled
*separately*, because loaders are their own binaries. `boot/efi.zig` builds
`BOOTX64.efi`, a distinct executable from the kernel ELF. On a Pi there is no
separate loader at all — the firmware jumps straight into the kernel with a
device-tree pointer, so that entry work would live in the AArch64 arch code.
Either path converges on the same neutral [`BootInfo`](memory-map.md).
## Current x86_64 contents
- **`system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/cpu.zig`** — the `arch` module root. Exposes `halt()` (see
[halting.md](halting.md)), `init()` (bring up the descriptor tables),
`enablePaging()`, `setFaultHandler`, `readCr2`/`readCr3`, and the `CpuState`
trap frame.
- **`system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/gdt.zig`** / **`idt.zig`** / **`tss.zig`** — the GDT, IDT and
TSS plus CPU-exception handling (see [interrupts.md](interrupts.md)).
- **`system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/paging.zig`** — the kernel's page tables (see
[paging.md](paging.md)).
- **`system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/apic.zig`** — the Local APIC and its timer, the source of
device interrupts (see [device-interrupts.md](device-interrupts.md)).
- **`system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/serial.zig`** / **`io.zig`** — the COM1 UART (the kernel's
machine-readable log channel, see [testing.md](testing.md)) and the shared
port-I/O + MSR primitives.
- **`system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/isr.s`** — the exception stubs, the `lgdt`/`lidt`/`ltr` load
helpers, and the context switch (`switch_context` / `task_trampoline`, see
[scheduling.md](scheduling.md)) — real assembly, since Zig inline asm can't
express them.
- **`system/kernel/architecture/x86_64/linker.ld`** — the kernel link layout (fixed low load
address, one PT_LOAD per permission set).
The kernel entry point `_start` currently still lives in the generic `main.zig` as
a thin trampoline into `kmain`. It's arch-adjacent (its calling convention is
x86_64 [SysV](sysv.md), via the shared `danos.kernel_abi`), but it's three lines
and mostly generic, so it stays put for now. When AArch64 arrives — where entry means setting
up a stack and reading a device-tree pointer from a register — the entry work will
be substantial and per-arch, and *that* is when we extract an entry interface into
the arch modules.
## The discipline
The thing that makes this help rather than hurt: **only extract what's provably
architecture-specific, and let the interface emerge with the second
implementation.** With a single architecture you're guessing at the seam, and a
wrong guess encoded as elaborate abstraction is expensive to undo. So:
- Move code into `arch/` only when it genuinely names CPU-specific machinery.
- Grow the `arch` surface one function at a time, as steps need it.
- Don't pre-design the interrupt or paging interfaces before writing them.
Directory hygiene is cheap and reversible; premature abstraction is neither. When
arch #2 lands and something doesn't fit, reshaping a few hundred lines is nothing —
unwinding an abstraction empire is not.